Blog |
One of the reasons employees dread performance assessments is the fear of stepping on hidden land mines. Managers who are reluctant or uncomfortable giving negative feedback avoid these discussions by ignoring emails and rushing from meeting to meeting, leaving the employee with a false sense of security. However, when performance failures finally pop up during the assessment meeting like mid-summer squalls, the climate quickly changes from sunny skies to a storm alert. Without clear communications of the process and value of performance assessments, employees are left to draw their own, often incorrect, conclusions on the usefulness of why it is being used. The thought of their manager, peers, co-workers and others picking apart their performance brings apprehension and a lot of questions. Who will be my raters? Will the information be kept confidential? Will I be accountable to everyone, or just my manager? Discussing the performance assessment process and subsequent outcomes in advance helps to remove the employee’s fears and reinforces trust in the manager and the process. Some points to cover include: 1. The company’s decision to adopt the performance assessment process From a manager’s perspective, performance assessments take a lot of time to fill out. Meetings with direct reports also take up time during otherwise busy days. and hold employee meetings. Unfortunately, some managers consider their job complete once the employee’s signature in on the last page. A performance assessment is a working document – a playbook for the next review period’s interactions. For the employee, the realization that the performance assessment ends up in a file drawer, never to be seen again until the following year, is the biggest disappointment. Any trust gained during the process quickly fades away as the months go by without mention of goals or milestones. The employee is responsible for “shaping up” by working on the goals on his own without any feedback from the manager. To continue the development process and get commitment from the employee, B=be sure the employee understands the "next steps" after the assessment meeting: 1. Periodic, scheduled follow-up meetings will be a part of the process With this type of commitment, it’s no wonder that there is little or no performance improvement within an organization. "Outstanding leaders go out of the way to boost the self-esteem of their personnel. If people believe in themselves, it's amazing what they can accomplish,” stated Sam Walton, founder of WalMart. The follow-up process makes the employee and manager a team committed to performance improvement and sends the message that the employee is a valuable asset. MNH2011-10-26 |
Related Articles
Latest News
- Trust: The Critical Ingredient to Ignite a Conscientious Workforce
- Approaching the 4R Model of Transformational Leadership
- Defining Trusted Leaders Does Not Have to be a Tight Rope Act
- Organizational Trust Starts with Trustworthy Leaders
- Q&A with CEO & President, Michael Stewart, and COO, Gary Johnsen
- Work Effects Contributes HR Content to Canadian-based Troy Media
- Work Effects to Present at 2011 Minnesota SHRM State Conference Event
- Work Effects Participates in Chief Learning Officer Article on Leadership
- Work Effects Launches New Corporate Website
- Work Effects Case Study Highlighted in T+D Magazine